Review: The coronavirus infodemic

Review: The coronavirus infodemic

This article provides best practices for assessing information about COVID-19.

The author provides best practice, common sense, and fact-checking questions to ask when evaluating health information:

  • Are multiple outlets reporting the same information?
  • What is the most credible source of information?
  • Do multiple articles report contradictory information?
  • What is the underlying source material?
  • Is the source of the original research one of the leading, peer-reviewed journals in the field?
  • Are the charts and graphs an accurate representation of the scientific research presented in the article?
  • Is the information plausible
  • Is the article headline a variation on the theme of “The Secret That Even Doctors Won’t Tell You”?
  • If the breakthrough is a drug claim, has it been used in human trials?
  • Does the article have a comments section?
  • What happens if you do your own research on the topic, along with other keywords such as “myth,” “hoax,” “scam,” “false,” “clickbait,” and “junk science”?
|2020-07-09T09:08:14-04:00July 9th, 2020|COVID-19 Literature|Comments Off on Review: The coronavirus infodemic

About the Author: James Dudley

James Dudley

Get Involved with Indiana CTSI